Wednesday, October 29, 2014

The Creation of Monsters as a Fantastic Art Through the Lens of the Trilogies Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings

Within the fantasy genre of literature, authors have created things that are not native to our lives. They create a new realm of creatures, plants, and human-like races. Not all monsters are evil, snaggle tooth, troll looking creatures. They can be anything different from you, the human. Fantasy is the liberation of the imagination (Mathews, 2002). By letting their imaginations run rampant, authors have created a massive amount of new creatures. These creatures have become legends and pieces of art. A monster in a fantasy novel is a piece of art, especially when film producers try to create the monster for the screen. Fantasy is the mother of the arts and the origin of marvels.
Determining the type of fantasy that each of these books are, can help juristic the creations of the creatures within them. J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter can fit into almost all four of the fantastic categories: Linimal, Intrustive, Portal and Immersive (Mendelsohn, 2008).  Harry Potter meets the criteria to be a liminal fantasy because a lot of the story takes place within the ‘muggle’ world, or our world, and it is ignored or not noticed by the muggles. They do not notice it but their worlds run parallel with each other. The books can also be intrusive because Hagrid intruded upon Harry’s life and brought him to the magic. Portal fantasy can also be used to describe Harry Potter because they go through Platform 9 ¾ and through the wall in the Leaky Cauldron into Diagon Alley. To see the book as an immersive fantasy, we can look at Hogwarts itself and its neighboring town, Hogsmead. Both of these places are strictly wizards and witches. The story immerses itself in these places where it is its own “Wizarding World” where no muggle can get to. Since the book can fit all of these traits of the fantastic it opens up a whole world of fantastic creatures and monsters that Rowling can create. The possibilities are endless. She can create things that are strictly from the “Wizarding World” or she can take things from the muggle world, like mythology, and incorporate it into her story.
The Lord of the Rings does not fit into all four of the fantastic but it does fit the definition of a portal fantasy and an immersive fantasy (Mendelsohn, 2008). Arguably, The Lord of the Rings is a portal fantasy because of the ship passage the elves, and later Frodo and Bilbo, take to ‘leave’ Middle Earth. This is the ‘portal’ in which the fantasy theory is linked. I prefer to think The Lord of the Rings as an immersive fantasy. Since the whole story takes place on Middle Earth, we can infer that it is its own world, and is not associated with ‘our’ world nor any other world. Everything in Middle Earth is its own, yet it is still slightly similar to our world. The mountains, the horses, and humans are all reflections of our world. Tolkien’s story does not have nearly as many creatures and monsters as the Harry Potter but it still creates a fantastic genre of monsters for the world of fantasy.
            In order to talk about the creation of monsters as a form of art, we must define what a monster really is. According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, a monster can be defined as “one who deviates from normal or acceptable behavior or character” or “a strange or horrible imaginary creature” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). In Diana Jone’s Book, The Tough Guide to Fantasyland, she says “Most of them have something snaky about them” (Jones, 2001). To say that the ‘impossible monsters’ in these stories create a mother of the arts is slightly unfair to the other creatures within the stories. Not all creatures are monsters, and not all monsters are creatures. Humans can be monsters too. It is up to the fantastic writers to create their own unique creatures and monster. The authors become literary artists.
            The Lord of the Rings and the Harry Potter novels both demonstrate the fantastic creations of fantasy as a form of art. The creatures and monsters within The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter are similar in certain ways, yet they have their own distinct characteristics. The similarities of the monsters are that they are each respective author’s own creations. Most of the monsters in Harry Potter were created by J.K. Rowling while quite a few of the monsters in The Lord of the Rings were created by J.R.R. Tolkien.  Another similarity that they both have is that some of the creatures or monsters are taken from other fantastic works. J.K. Rowling used quite a bit of mythology while creating her creatures. Tolkien used Elves, Dwarves and Wizards which had be known to exist in other novels. Both of these authors kept humans in their fantastic writing. ‘Muggles’ in Harry Potter and ‘Men’ in The Lord of the Rings are relatable to the reader, while the other characters are not.
            When thinking of a monster, one may think of death. Because typically, a monster’s main goal is to scare or kill. Four great examples of monsters like this in Harry Potter are Boggarts, Dementors, Basilisks and Voldemort himself. Boggarts, while they are terrifying to each individual based on their fears, their aim is not necessarily to kill. Boggarts do not have as much power as the creatures that they turn into. They cannot suck the soul like a Dementor, nor do they have a cry loud enough to kill when it is a Banshee (Rowling, 1999).  Rowling created this monster in her own mind, put it to paper and made it come alive. Rowling also created Dementors. A Dementor is a monster that feeds off of human happiness and are considered to be one of the worst creatures to inhabit the world (Rowling, 1999). While a Basilisk was not invented by Rowling, she uses them in her second novel, The Chamber of Secrets. With eyes that petrify with one glance, and the deadliest venom of all serpents, the Basilisk is one of the most lethal creatures (Rowling, 1998). Pliny the Elder was one of the first to mention a Basilisk in history and mythology, Rowling merely borrowed the idea to fashion the King of all Serpents and pet to Salazar Slytherin. (Rowling, 2001). It is up for debate as to whether or not Voldemort is a monster. He is still human, yet he possesses the qualities of a monster. He deviates from normal behavior, and is rather terrifying. The creation of Voldemort, his corruption, rebirth and the use of his Horcruxes is all very disturbing (Rowling, 2007). For Rowling to create such  terrifying pieces of work, truly shows the ability of her imagination, and her capability to create something that people would marvel at. Rowling has a talent for creating terrifying, death oriented monsters in her Harry Potter novels, as Tolkien does in his.
            The Lord of the Rings trilogy also has many terrifying monsters. The Nazgul and their mounts, and the Orc Breed in general are all disturbing monsters that you don’t want to get in the path of. The Nazgul, or Ringwraiths, are the nine men that succumbed to the power of the One Ring and are bound to serve it forever as a wraith. In the book they are described as Sauron’s most terrible servants (Tolkien, 1954). Even their voices as they flew around the battlefields destroyed people.
“At length (of their cries) even the stout-hearted would fling themselves to the ground as the hidden menace passed over them, or they would stand, letting their weapons fall from nerveless hands while into their minds a blackness came, and they thought no more of war, but only of hiding and of crawling, and of death.” (Return of the King, pp. 97, Tolkien, 1954)
The wraiths are upon the most terrifying creatures that roam Middle Earth. Their black winged, long necked steeds are also quite grotesque. They are referred to as “Hell Hawks” or “Fell Beasts”.
Sauron’s minions in The Lord of the Rings vary in size and ability. Goblins are the smallest of the creatures and love explosives. Orcs are their own disturbed, aggressive, foul race. They are cannibalistic creatures of destruction and loathing. The Uruk-hai a larger, more advanced breed of Orc that were mainly utilized by Sauron for his war on Rohan (Tolkien, 1954). The creation of these dark creatures abandons reason and creates a new genre of monsters for the world to admire.
             Both Rowling and Tolkien use the Goblin in their novels, but they are very different. Both of the renditions of the Goblin in the respective novels are clever. Rowling’s Goblins are the bankers of the Wizarding World (Rowling, 1997), while Tolkien’s are devious mechanism builders (Tolkien, 1954). Reshaping a creature that was already made makes a big difference in the image that the creatures give off. Tolkien’s goblins are much more monstrous than Rowling’s banking creatures. Recreating the creature to the respective story is another way of taking a piece of art, or fantasy, and making it into your own. That’s what art is about, expression.
To better convey the rich diversity of the creatures and monsters created in their respective worlds, the authors also draw focus to friendly creatures or monsters. Rowling’s Wizarding World is full of various creatures that we, as muggles, may consider monsters. House elves, while they do clean, cook, and make your bed, are still little elves that are ‘strange’ and betray ‘normality’ (Rowling, 1998). A hippogriff is another creature from mythology that Rowling borrowed for her book. The hippogriff is a symbol of dominance, with its way of greeting others. With the winged body of a horse, and head and torso of an eagle, this creature demonstrates one of the magical creations that fantasy and mythology has brought us (Rowling, 1999). Faux, the Phoenix belonging to Dumbledore, is a mythological swan-sized scarlet bird with a long golden tail (Rowling, 2001). Harry’s fascination with Faux could by symbolic to the way Harry dies, and comes back to life in the end of the series since Phoenix’s die in a burst of flame and are reborn through their ashes. Creating these magical creatures was not purely Rowling’s imagination, but she uses them and adapts them to her novel.
The Lord of the Rings also uses some more known creatures within his story. The mix of human like races in The Lord of the Rings isn’t the sole creation of Tolkien, although he made them highly popular and more well-known. The Elves, Dwarves and Hobbits are the three main races of men outside the world of regular men. Elves are one of the oldest races on Middle Earth and are known to be the fairest and wisest of them. Dwarves are a stunted race that typically dwell in the mountains. Their weapons of choice are axes, while the elves are typically archers. The hobbits are not a fighting race, as they are even smaller than dwarves. Hobbits live quiet lives in the Shire and rarely see ‘adventures’ (Tolkien, 1954). Tolkien adapted these already made fantastic creations to something that would be marked as his version of them. Art is something that is created with imagination and skill (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). In order to create these masterpieces, Tolkien and Rowling both had to have a great imagination and immense skill.
The fact that both of the authors use Elves is interesting. The elves in the respective stories are so different, yet known by the same name. The only similarity between the two elf breeds are their pointy ears. Elves have been known throughout literature and are used quite commonly. Typically they are short, little workers, like Santa’s helpers. Tolkien takes the idea of an elf to a different level. Now they are tall, beautiful, smart warriors (Tolkien, 1954). The elves in both of these books are completely different, yet are a similar creature. This is what art is, taking something, expanding the idea of it and molding it to something else.
Creating an entire new world, filled with creatures, monsters, people, towns, and everything that the world consists of is a literary art. Fantasy writers have more of a task to create a new world, rather than other authors, who write about things in our ‘real’ world.  J.K. Rowling and J.R.R. Tolkien are literary artists who created an entire world filled with terrors and delights.  The creation of their monsters in the novels is simply an artistic creation and allows us to see that fantasy is the mother of the arts, opening doors of endless possibilities. The creation of the monsters like Dementors and Orcs abandons reason and creates a new genre of monsters for the world to marvel at. The use of mythology in the Harry Potter novels shows us the timelessness of the creations that other authors have made. The authors even use the same names for some of their creatures, yet they are distinctly different. Because of the range of fantastic categories that these particular novels can be related to, they are prime examples of the vast amount of monsters that can be created in the fantastic genre.  By looking at the examples within these literary fantastic novels we can safely say fantasy truly is the mother of the arts and the origin of marvels.
           


References:

Art. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/art

Jones, D. (1998). The tough guide to fantasyland. London: Penguin Books Ltd.

Mendelsohn, F. (2008).  Rhetorics of Fantasy. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan UP.

Monster. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monster

Pliny the Elder. (1855). The Natural History. Bostock, J, Riley, H. (Translators).

Rowling, J.K. (1997) Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rowling, J.K. (1998) Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rowling, J.K. (1999) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rowling, J.K. (2001) Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Rowling, J.K. (2007) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.


Tolkien, J. R. R. (1954). The Lord of the Rings. New York: Harper Collins Publishing Ltd

No comments:

Post a Comment